Radiant Creamy Concealer Crema Catalana dupes and alternatives NARS
4.5 (22,453)·Fair · Cool undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same medium coverage· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 12-hour wear
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 31% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for dry skin
Retailer shade note: M1.75 - Medium with neutral undertones
Matches: Same radiant finish· Same medium coverage· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than cool undertone· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: medium with neutral undertones
Matches: Same radiant finish· Both claim not settling into lines· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone· Buildable rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish & visual result
89
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Radiant · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same radiant finish· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· No blurring effect claimed· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
0
Looks identical · Radiant finish
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for normal/dry/combination skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Both claim not settling into lines· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone· Satin rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Satin · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Satin rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: medium light with peach undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
43
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
90
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for medium to tan skin w/ warm olive undertones
$16.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$19.01 less (53%)4.4 (832)
Matches: Same radiant finish· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than cool undertone· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
0
Close colour · Radiant finish
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for normal/dry/combination skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· No blurring effect claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
51
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Natural finish
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for normal/dry/combination skin
$15.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$20.01 less (56%)4.2 (1,617)
Matches: Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly deeper· Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
43
Wear & performance
83
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Same radiant finish· Same medium coverage· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: medium with golden undertones
$10.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$25.01 less (69%)4.1 (2,823)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· No blurring effect claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
51
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Natural finish
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for normal/dry/combination skin
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
43
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
90
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for medium to tan skin w/ warm undertones
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
43
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
90
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for medium skin w/ warm undertones
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 16-hour wear· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish & visual result
54
Wear & performance
83
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: medium skin with warm, peach undertones
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish & visual result
43
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
90
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for medium skin w/ very warm undertones
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 16-hour wear· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish & visual result
54
Wear & performance
83
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: medium skin with warm, golden undertones
$10.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$25.01 less (69%)4.1 (2,823)
Matches: Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Natural rather than radiant finish· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
51
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
0
Close colour · Natural finish
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Natural rather than radiant finish · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for normal/dry/combination skin
The closest shade to NARS Radiant Creamy Concealer Crema Catalana (Fair · Cool undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
NARS Soft Matte Complete Concealer in Crema Catalana, against NARS Radiant Creamy Concealer in Crema Catalana. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCrema CatalanaClosest shade matchCrema CatalanaHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%97#fdcca8#f8caa8Looks identicalColour difference 1.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98FairFairSameDepth difference: 1.4
Retailer descriptionMediumMediumBoth described as mediumThe retailers describe the same depth
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared62
Finish35%12RadiantMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than radiant
Coverage30%100MediumMediumSameSame medium coverage
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared74
Longevity30%8016-hour wear12-hour wearClose12-hour wear claimed against 16-hour wear
Transfer resistance20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall60
Skin type100%60Normal, dry, combinationNormal, combination, oilyBoth marketed for normal/combination skin
Overall match 83/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Glossier Stretch Concealer for Dewy Buildable Coverage in Light 4, against NARS Radiant Creamy Concealer in Crema Catalana. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCrema CatalanaClosest overall alternativeLight 4How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%93#fdcca8#f7cba5Very close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98FairFairSameDepth difference: 1.2
Retailer descriptionMediumNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared89
Finish35%100RadiantRadiantSameSame radiant finish
Coverage30%100MediumBuildableCloseBuildable coverage rather than medium (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared65
Longevity30%7016-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 16-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; your product does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Normal, dry, combinationNot publishedSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 87/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraSame price
View at Walmart
