Pout Preserve Hydrating Peptide Lip Treatment Pomegranate Fizz Glimmer - sheer red tint with gold glimmer dupes and alternatives OLEHENRIKSEN
4.4 (3,079)·Red · Neutral · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lip gloss overall: shade match 50%, finish and visual result 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 10%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lip gloss on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lip gloss on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Coral rather than red· High shine rather than sheer tint (shine)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Very close colour · High shine · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Coral rather than red · High shine rather than sheer tint (shine) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same transparency: tinted· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Cool rather than neutral undertone
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · High shine · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Cool rather than neutral undertone · High shine rather than sheer tint (shine) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same transparency: tinted· Both claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Plum rather than red· High shine rather than sheer tint (shine)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · High shine · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Plum rather than red · High shine rather than sheer tint (shine) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Cool rather than neutral undertone
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish & visual result
84
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Cool rather than neutral undertone · Shimmer rather than sparkle (shimmer) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Pink rather than red· Shimmer rather than sparkle (shimmer)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish & visual result
84
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Pink rather than red · Shimmer rather than sparkle (shimmer) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same transparency: tinted· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than neutral undertone· Plum rather than red
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than neutral undertone · Plum rather than red · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same transparency: tinted· Same shimmer: sparkle· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Cool rather than neutral undertone
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish & visual result
96
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Cool rather than neutral undertone · Pink rather than red · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Retailer shade note: sheer magenta with silver sparkle
Chanel ROUGE COCO HYDRA GLOSS Hydrating and Smoothing High-Shine Lipgloss in 448 OPULENCE, against OLEHENRIKSEN Pout Preserve Hydrating Peptide Lip Treatment in Pomegranate Fizz Glimmer - sheer red tint with gold glimmer. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePomegranate Fizz Glimmer - sheer red tint with gold glimmerClosest shade match448 OPULENCEHow they compareScore
Shade match50% of overall93
Colour55%87#b3343e#b33536Very close colourColour difference 2.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.0 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 76/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Summer Fridays Lip Butter Balm Treatment for Hydration + Nourishing Shine in Cherry - sheer cherry red, against OLEHENRIKSEN Pout Preserve Hydrating Peptide Lip Treatment in Pomegranate Fizz Glimmer - sheer red tint with gold glimmer. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePomegranate Fizz Glimmer - sheer red tint with gold glimmerClosest overall alternativeCherry - sheer cherry redHow they compareScore
Shade match50% of overall76
Colour55%72#b3343e#af0f32Close colourColour difference 4.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%83MediumDeep / darkSome differenceDepth difference 6.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%60NeutralCoolSome differenceOne side neutral: partial agreement
Colour family15%100RedRedSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Shine40%—not comparableSheer tintNot listedNot listed for eitherA shine level not listed for one product
Transparency35%100TintedTintedSameBoth tinted
Shimmer25%—not comparableSparkleNot listedNot listed for eitherShimmer not listed for one product
Wear & performance15% of overall40
Longevity100%40Not listedLong-wearingSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & suitability10% of overall · 1 of 2 compared100
Non-sticky50%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a non-sticky feel
Overall match 79/100Shade match 76/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $14 more
