Major Dimension Eye Illusion Eyeshadow Duo Slow Burn dupes and alternatives Patrick Ta
4.0 (616)
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Compared using the lighter eyeshadow pan of your shade
73
overall
Shade match78
$30Ulta Beauty$12 less (29%)4.5 (991)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Claims waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than rose· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than palette (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than rose · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than palette (format) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
NARS Total Seduction Eyeshadow Stick in Mind Games, against Patrick Ta Major Dimension Eye Illusion Eyeshadow Duo in Slow Burn. Compared using the deeper eyeshadow pan of your shade. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSlow BurnClosest shade matchMind GamesHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour60%95#a35f63#a45e5fLooks identicalColour difference 1.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100MediumDeep / darkCloseDepth difference 0.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedCoolUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100PlumPlumSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall83
Finish65%100ShimmerShimmerSameSame shimmer finish
Pigmentation20%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Format15%35PaletteCreamDifferentCream rather than powder
Wear & performance10% of overall40
Longevity50%40Not listed16-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Overall match 85/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Ulta Beauty Collection Color Snack Eyeshadow Duo in Peach Mochi, against Patrick Ta Major Dimension Eye Illusion Eyeshadow Duo in Slow Burn. Matched on pan 2, against the lighter eyeshadow pan of your shade. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSlow BurnClosest overall alternativePeach MochiHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%91#d9a9a3#e0a7a0Very close colourColour difference 2.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100LightLightSameDepth difference 0.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100RoseRoseSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall93
Finish65%100ShimmerShimmerSameSame shimmer finish
Pigmentation20%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Format15%100PalettePowderCloseBoth powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Longevity50%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists long wear
Overall match 87/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora$14 less (33%)
