Major Headlines Double-Take Crème & Powder Blush Duo Just Enough dupes and alternatives Patrick Ta
4.6 (4,345)·Pink · Cool · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Powder rather than cream (format)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: natural· Same format: cream
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Rose rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Rose rather than pink · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Dewy rather than natural (finish)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Dewy rather than natural (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Claims comfort
Differences: Mauve rather than pink· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
56
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than pink · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Deeper· Powder rather than cream (format)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Powder rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Differences: Powder rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Combination rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
37
Close colour · Satin · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Combination rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Dewy rather than natural (finish)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims transfer resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Powder rather than cream (format)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims waterproof· Claims hydration
Differences: Deeper· Powder rather than cream (format)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Powder rather than cream (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Saie Dew Blush Liquid Cream Blush in Baby, against Patrick Ta Major Headlines Double-Take Crème & Powder Blush Duo in Just Enough. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeJust EnoughClosest shade matchBabyHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour55%93#fda8c6#fbadcdVery close colourColour difference 1.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98LightLightSameDepth difference 1.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared65
Finish50%67NaturalDewySome differenceDewy finish rather than natural
Pigmentation25%—not comparableNot listedBuildableNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format25%60CreamLiquidSome differenceLiquid rather than cream
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Overall match 77/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Lancôme Blush Subtil Oil-Free Powder Blush in 500 Ôh La La Pink, against Patrick Ta Major Headlines Double-Take Crème & Powder Blush Duo in Just Enough. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeJust EnoughClosest overall alternative500 Ôh La La PinkHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall86
Colour55%78#fda8c6#fb9ab5Close colourColour difference 3.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%87LightLightSameDepth difference 5.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared87
Finish50%100NaturalNaturalSameSame natural finish
Pigmentation25%—not comparableNot listedSheerNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format25%60CreamLiquidSome differenceLiquid rather than cream
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Overall match 88/100Shade match 86/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.