Major Skin Hydra-Luxe Luminous Skin Perfecting Foundation 12 Peach dupes and alternatives Patrick Ta
4.3 (1,612)·Medium light · Warm · peach undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same medium coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for combination skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Same radiant finish· Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Light-medium rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
0
Close colour · Radiant · Light-medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Light-medium rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for normal/dry/combination skin
Retailer shade note: Medium with neutral undertones
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Light rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Light rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for normal skin
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 12-hour wear
Differences: Slightly deeper· Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
45
Wear & performance
55
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for dry skin
Retailer shade note: medium warm beige with rosy undertone for medium skin
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Light rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Light rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
90
Colour not compared · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
90
Colour not compared · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Contains listed fragrance
$35Ulta Beauty(product price)$23 less (40%)4.5 (732)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
57
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
33
Close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for normal/dry skin
Retailer shade note: medium to tan with warm undertones
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Light rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Light rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim
$40Ulta Beauty(product price)$18 less (31%)4.3 (1,058)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Light rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
52
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Light rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for combination skin
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for normal skin
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same medium coverage· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
31
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for normal skin
Retailer shade note: medium tan with neutral undertones
The closest shade to Patrick Ta Major Skin Hydra-Luxe Luminous Skin Perfecting Foundation 12 Peach (Medium light · Warm · peach undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Revolution Beauty Conceal & Define Soft Matte Full Coverage Foundation in F11.5C, against Patrick Ta Major Skin Hydra-Luxe Luminous Skin Perfecting Foundation in 12 Peach. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade12 PeachClosest shade matchF11.5CHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%93#dc967a#da9878Very close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Overall match 72/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
LIXR Beauty Multi-Use Cream-to-Powder Concealer & Foundation Stick in Sunset 5W, against Patrick Ta Major Skin Hydra-Luxe Luminous Skin Perfecting Foundation in 12 Peach. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade12 PeachClosest overall alternativeSunset 5WHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall86
Colour60%79#dc967a#cb9377Close colourColour difference 3.8 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared86
Finish35%—not comparableRadiantNot listedNot comparedFinish not listed for one product
Coverage30%100MediumMediumSameSame medium coverage
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 5 compared60
Longevity30%708-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 8-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; your product does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall60
Skin type100%60Normal, dry, combinationDry, combination, oilyBoth marketed for dry/combination skin
Overall match 81/100Shade match 86/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty$42.01 less (72%)
