Butter Glow Contour Wand Fair/Light dupes and alternatives Physicians Formula
4.6 (129)·Brown · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar contour overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar contour on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar contour on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$8Ulta Beauty(product price)$5.49 less (41%)4.6 (16,298)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same format: liquid· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Bronze rather than brown· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
75
Looks identical · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than brown · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Does not claim hydration · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than sensitive (skin types)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as contour (suited)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Stick rather than liquid (format)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish, pigmentation & format
89
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
36
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Stick rather than liquid (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than sensitive (skin types)
Use as contour: possible
Retailer shade note: medium-deep with warm undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Stick rather than liquid (format)· Does not claim comfort· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Very close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Stick rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: liquid· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Bronze rather than brown· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
75
Very close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than brown · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Does not claim hydration · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than sensitive (skin types)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as contour (suited)
$8Ulta Beauty(product price)$5.49 less (41%)4.6 (16,298)
Matches: Same format: liquid· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Does not claim hydration· Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
75
Slight colour difference · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Does not claim hydration · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than sensitive (skin types)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as contour (possible)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Stick rather than liquid (format)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: shadow for light to medium skin tones with golden undertones
$8Ulta Beauty(product price)$5.49 less (41%)4.6 (16,298)
Matches: Same format: liquid· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
75
Slight colour difference · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Does not claim hydration · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than sensitive (skin types)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as contour (suited)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Both claim comfort
Differences: Bronze rather than brown· Powder rather than liquid (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than brown · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than sensitive (skin types)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as contour (suited)
Matches: Same format: liquid· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims waterproof
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Does not claim comfort· Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
63
Slight colour difference · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Does not claim comfort · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than sensitive (skin types)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as contour (suited)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim hydration
Differences: Stick rather than liquid (format)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
89
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
36
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Stick rather than liquid (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Powder rather than liquid (format)· Does not claim comfort· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
51
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than sensitive (skin types)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as contour (possible)
Retailer shade note: medium-deep to deep with warm undertone
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Stick rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
75
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Stick rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Dry, Normal, Combination, Oily, Sensitive rather than sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim hydration
Differences: Bronze rather than brown· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
36
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than brown · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than sensitive (skin types)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as contour (suited)
$8Ulta Beauty(product price)$5.49 less (41%)4.6 (16,298)
Matches: Same format: liquid· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
75
Slight colour difference · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Does not claim hydration · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than sensitive (skin types)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as contour (suited)
Tom Ford Architecture Soft Matte Contour Duo in Intensity 2.0, against Physicians Formula Butter Glow Contour Wand in Fair/Light. Matched on the contour pan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeFair/LightClosest shade matchIntensity 2.0How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour50%90#7f503e#7e4c35Very close colourColour difference 2.3 (0 is identical)
Depth25%97MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared75
Finish60%78MatteNaturalCloseNatural finish rather than matte
Pigmentation20%65BuildableSheerSome differenceSheer rather than buildable
Format20%—not comparableLiquidNot listedNot listed for eitherFormat not listed for one product
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%0SensitiveNormalDifferentMarketed for different skin types
Overall match 79/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Haus Labs Precision Sculpt Shaping Balm Contour Stick in Taper, against Physicians Formula Butter Glow Contour Wand in Fair/Light. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeFair/LightClosest overall alternativeTaperHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour50%88#7f503e#7f533cVery close colourColour difference 2.5 (0 is identical)
Depth25%98MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared86
Finish60%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format20%45LiquidStickSome differenceStick rather than liquid
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%73SensitiveNormal, Oily, SensitiveSome differenceBoth marketed for sensitive skin
Overall match 91/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $14.51 more
