Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
$18Ulta Beauty(product price)$8 less (31%)3.5 (165)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Terracotta rather than silver· Cream rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than silver · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
$23Ulta Beauty(product price)$3 less (12%)4.3 (828)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same longevity: 12-hour wear
Differences: Copper rather than silver· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than silver · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Grey rather than silver· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Grey rather than silver · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than silver· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
94
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than silver · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Taupe rather than silver· Stick rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
92
Wear & performance
52
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than silver · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Golden rather than silver· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than silver · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than silver· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
94
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than silver · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than silver· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
80
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than silver · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than silver· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than silver · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
$15Ulta Beauty(product price)$11 less (42%)4.0 (271)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Taupe rather than silver· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than silver · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than silver· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than silver · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: a shimmering golden copper / a warm beige brown
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than silver· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
49
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than silver · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same format: liquid· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than silver· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
56
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than silver · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than silver· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than silver · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Same longevity: 12-hour wear
Differences: Golden rather than silver· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than silver · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Bronze rather than silver· Cream rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
94
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than silver · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Bronze rather than silver· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than silver · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Copper rather than silver· Dewy rather than metallic (finish)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
53
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than silver · Dewy rather than metallic (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Pink rather than silver
Score details
Shade match
44
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Pink rather than silver · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same format: liquid· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Taupe rather than silver· Natural rather than metallic (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
39
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than silver · Natural rather than metallic (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Sold as contour, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: liquid· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Brown rather than silver· Matte rather than metallic (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
31
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than silver · Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Patrick Ta Major Dimension Eye Illusion Eyeshadow Duo in Do You Know Who I Am, against Rabanne Colorshot Metallic Liquid Eyeshadow in 62 Meteor Light. Matched on the lighter eyeshadow pan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade62 Meteor LightClosest matchDo You Know Who I AmHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall70
Colour60%93#b08561#b7865eVery close colourColour difference 1.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Overall match 68/100Shade match 70/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $8 more
