Liquid Touch Brightening Concealer 160C dupes and alternatives Rare Beauty
4.2 (2,558)·Light · Cool · pink undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly deeper· Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
92
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
$8Ulta Beauty(product price)$16 less (67%)4.3 (8,153)
Matches: Both claim long-wearing· Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Satin rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
75
Close colour · Satin · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Satin rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for oily skin
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly deeper· Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
92
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
75
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: light medium with cool peachy undertones
$8Ulta Beauty(product price)$16 less (67%)4.3 (8,153)
Matches: Both claim long-wearing· Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Satin rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
75
Close colour · Satin · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Satin rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: light with neutral undertones
$8Ulta Beauty(product price)$16 less (67%)4.3 (8,153)
Matches: Both claim long-wearing· Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Satin rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
75
Close colour · Satin · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Satin rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: light with warm-neutral undertones
Matches: Both claim long-wearing· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
92
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
The closest shade to Rare Beauty Liquid Touch Brightening Concealer 160C (Light · Cool · pink undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Estée Lauder Double Wear Stay-in-Place 24-Hour Concealer in 2C, against Rare Beauty Liquid Touch Brightening Concealer in 160C. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade160CClosest shade match2CHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%93#efbfa5#eac0aaVery close colourColour difference 1.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100LightLightSameDepth difference: 0.2
Retailer descriptionLightLight mediumSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Overall match 80/100Shade match 96/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
e.l.f. Cosmetics Hydrating Camo Concealer in Fair Rose, against Rare Beauty Liquid Touch Brightening Concealer in 160C. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade160CClosest overall alternativeFair RoseHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour60%87#efbfa5#e9b999Very close colourColour difference 2.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%94LightLightSameDepth difference: 3.2
Retailer descriptionLightFairSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Overall match 87/100Shade match 91/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $12 more
View at Walgreens
