Glimmer Liquid Shadow UFGlow dupes and alternatives Revlon
4.3 (3,038)·Silver · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Same skin types: sensitive
Differences: White rather than silver· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than silver · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: 24-hour wear
Differences: White rather than silver· Stick rather than liquid (format)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
82
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
20
Very close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than silver · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Cream rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: White rather than silver· Palette rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than silver · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: white aurora (light coral glitter) , coral starlight (coral peach matte), Flaming Sunset (neutral peach brown matte)
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Stick rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Same skin types: sensitive
Differences: Lighter· White rather than silver· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · White rather than silver · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Palette rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$2.99 less (25%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: White rather than silver· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than silver · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: White rather than silver· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than silver · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
38
Comfort & skin suitability
20
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination rather than sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Lighter· White rather than silver· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · White rather than silver · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: White rather than silver· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than silver · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Golden rather than silver· Stick rather than liquid (format)· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than silver · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: White rather than silver· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
53
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than silver · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Lighter· Golden rather than silver· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Golden rather than silver · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: shimmering golden marshmallow
Differences: Deeper· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
$7Ulta Beauty(product price)$4.99 less (42%)4.5 (2,019)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· White rather than silver· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · White rather than silver · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: White rather than silver· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: White rather than silver · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same format: liquid· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than silver· 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
53
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than silver · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Retailer shade note: champagne with silver and copper pearls
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim crease resistance· Claims hydration
Differences: Golden rather than silver· Cream rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than silver · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Lighter· Golden rather than silver· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
92
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Golden rather than silver · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
$7Ulta Beauty(product price)$4.99 less (42%)4.5 (2,019)
Glitter
Differences: Lighter· White rather than silver· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · White rather than silver · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
CoverGirl TruNaked Eyeshadow Palette in Smokey, against Revlon Glimmer Liquid Shadow in UFGlow. Matched on pan 8. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeUFGlowClosest shade matchSmokeyHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%92#dccec4#d9cec8Very close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100LightLightSameDepth difference 0.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100SilverSilverSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall29
Finish65%20ShimmerMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation20%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Format15%20LiquidPowderDifferentPowder rather than liquid
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableSensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 76/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableSensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 83/100Shade match 90/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.