Cashmere Matte Eyelights Desert Rose dupes and alternatives RMS Beauty
4.8 (709)·Pink · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Claims comfort
Differences: Golden rather than pink· Powder rather than cream (format)· 24-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
28
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than pink · Powder rather than cream (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
$17Ulta Beauty(product price)$13 less (43%)4.2 (339)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: cream
Differences: Deeper· Brown rather than pink· Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Brown rather than pink · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than pink· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
75
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than pink · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Lighter· Golden rather than pink· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
28
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Golden rather than pink · Powder rather than cream (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than pink· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
44
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than pink · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$21 less (70%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same finish: matte
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than pink· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
44
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than pink · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$5 less (17%)4.6 (3,381)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof· Claims comfort
Differences: Deeper· Rose rather than pink· Metallic rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
20
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Rose rather than pink · Metallic rather than matte (finish) · 16-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Ulta Beauty Collection Color Snack Eyeshadow Duo in Peach Mochi, against RMS Beauty Cashmere Matte Eyelights in Desert Rose. Matched on pan 1. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDesert RoseClosest shade matchPeach MochiHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall78
Colour60%80#f1a080#eda18cClose colourColour difference 3.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100LightLightSameDepth difference 0.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Overall match 56/100Shade match 78/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Urban Decay 24/7 Glaze-On Liquid Eyeshadow in Sugar Twist, against RMS Beauty Cashmere Matte Eyelights in Desert Rose. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDesert RoseClosest overall alternativeSugar TwistHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall74
Colour60%73#f1a080#e4a891Close colourColour difference 4.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98LightLightSameDepth difference 1.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedWarmUndertone unknown on one side
Overall match 59/100Shade match 74/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.