Long Wear Liquid Eyeshadow STAY-N Shu-ggah dupes and alternatives Sacheu
4.4 (1,050)·Rose · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Pink rather than rose· Cream rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than rose · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Differences: Mauve rather than rose· Palette rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than rose · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Mauve rather than rose· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Mauve rather than rose · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Plum rather than rose· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Plum rather than rose · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same format: liquid· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than rose· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than rose · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than rose· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than rose · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same format: liquid· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Mauve rather than rose
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Mauve rather than rose · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Palette rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
20
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Half Magic Eyeshadow Singles in Glamourust, against Sacheu Long Wear Liquid Eyeshadow STAY-N in Shu-ggah. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeShu-ggahClosest shade matchGlamourustHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour60%89#c47468#c87c70Very close colourColour difference 2.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%93MediumMediumSameDepth difference 3.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100RoseRoseSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared73
Finish65%85ShimmerMetallicCloseMetallic finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedOpaqueNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%20LiquidPowderDifferentPowder rather than liquid
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Overall match 79/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Makeup By Mario Long-Wear Cream Eyeshadow in Fizzy Fig, against Sacheu Long Wear Liquid Eyeshadow STAY-N in Shu-ggah. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeShu-ggahClosest overall alternativeFizzy FigHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall79
Colour60%82#c47468#ba7969Close colourColour difference 3.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Overall match 82/100Shade match 79/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta BeautyCosts $12 more
