Dew Blush Liquid Cream Blush Baby dupes and alternatives Saie
4.4 (3,501)·Pink · Cool · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, combination, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Matte rather than dewy (finish)· Powder rather than liquid (format)· 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish, pigmentation & format
53
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
59
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, combination, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Mauve rather than pink· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Mauve rather than pink · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, combination, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: dewy· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
71
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, combination, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Matte rather than dewy (finish)· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
53
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, combination, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, combination, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: dewy· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
82
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Deeper· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
61
Close colour · Satin · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim hydration · Combination rather than normal, combination, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, combination, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Matte rather than dewy (finish)· Powder rather than liquid (format)· 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
53
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, combination, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: dewy· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
59
Visibly different colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, combination, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: dewy· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Mauve rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
94
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Mauve rather than pink · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
82
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination, Oily rather than normal, combination, sensitive (skin types)
Patrick Ta Major Headlines Double-Take Crème & Powder Blush Duo in Just Enough, against Saie Dew Blush Liquid Cream Blush in Baby. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBabyClosest shade matchJust EnoughHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour55%93#fbadcd#fda8c6Very close colourColour difference 1.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98LightLightSameDepth difference 1.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared65
Finish50%67DewyNaturalSome differenceNatural finish rather than dewy
Pigmentation25%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format25%60LiquidCreamSome differenceCream rather than liquid
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Not listedLong-wearingSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Overall match 77/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Hourglass Ambient Lighting Blush in Ethereal Glow, against Saie Dew Blush Liquid Cream Blush in Baby. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBabyClosest overall alternativeEthereal GlowHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour55%83#fbadcd#eeb2ccClose colourColour difference 3.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightLightSameDepth difference 0.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared88
Finish50%100DewyDewySameSame dewy finish
Pigmentation25%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Format25%—not comparableLiquidNot listedNot listed for eitherFormat not listed for one product
Wear & performance15% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Longevity50%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists long wear
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Overall match 83/100Shade match 91/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta BeautyCosts $22 more
