SuperSuede Baked Eyeshadow with 16hr Wear Amaretto dupes and alternatives Saie
4.6 (205)·Brown · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same finish: matte
Differences: Copper rather than brown· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than brown · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Terracotta rather than brown· Stick rather than powder (format)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
37
Very close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than brown · Stick rather than powder (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: powder· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Lighter· Nude rather than brown· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
37
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Nude rather than brown · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Copper rather than brown· Liquid rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than brown · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Plum rather than brown· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Plum rather than brown · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Nude rather than brown· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than brown · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Terracotta rather than brown
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
53
Comfort & skin suitability
94
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Terracotta rather than brown · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$15 less (63%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: powder
Differences: Taupe rather than brown· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than brown · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Claims waterproof
Differences: Plum rather than brown· Stick rather than powder (format)· 11-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Very close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Plum rather than brown · Stick rather than powder (format) · 11-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Oily rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Copper rather than brown· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than brown · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than brown· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than brown · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: cool tan/beige shade with a matte finish
Differences: Deeper· Terracotta rather than brown· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Terracotta rather than brown · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: 16-hour wear· Claims waterproof
Differences: Terracotta rather than brown· Liquid rather than powder (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
61
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than brown · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration · Dry rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Pink rather than brown· Liquid rather than powder (format)· 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than brown · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Terracotta rather than brown· Stick rather than powder (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
60
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than brown · Stick rather than powder (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Mauve rather than brown· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than brown · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
35
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: white chocolate, rosy velvet, & brownie bite
Charlotte Tilbury Exagger-Eyes Waterproof Eyeshadow Stick in Desert Sculpt, against Saie SuperSuede Baked Eyeshadow with 16hr Wear in Amaretto. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeAmarettoClosest shade matchDesert SculptHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%97#a96755#a66754Looks identicalColour difference 0.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedWarmUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared68
Finish65%75MatteSatinSome differenceSatin finish rather than matte
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists an opacity
Format15%35PowderStickDifferentStick rather than powder
Wear & performance10% of overall68
Longevity50%6016-hour wear24-hour wearSome difference24-hour wear claimed against 16-hour wear
Overall match 84/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Jane Iredale PurePressed Eye Shadow Triple in Wild Flower, against Saie SuperSuede Baked Eyeshadow with 16hr Wear in Amaretto. Matched on pan 1. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeAmarettoClosest overall alternativeWild FlowerHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour60%87#a96755#a1695cVery close colourColour difference 2.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Finish65%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists an opacity
Format15%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared81
Longevity50%7016-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 16-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Skin types40%33Normal, Dry, SensitiveSensitiveDifferentBoth marketed for sensitive skin
Overall match 91/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty(product price)$4 less (17%)
Sephora
