Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: dewy· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Rose rather than brown / nude· Liquid rather than powder (format)· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than brown / nude · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: powder· Claims waterproof
Differences: Lighter· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Terracotta rather than brown / nude· Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
56
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Very close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than brown / nude · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: dewy· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Terracotta rather than brown / nude· Cream rather than powder (format)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than brown / nude · Cream rather than powder (format) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims waterproof
Differences: Matte rather than dewy (finish)· Liquid rather than powder (format)· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
37
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
61
Close colour · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Does not claim hydration · Normal rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: dewy· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Mauve rather than brown / nude· Cream rather than powder (format)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than brown / nude · Cream rather than powder (format) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: powder· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: dewy· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Mauve rather than brown / nude· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Mauve rather than brown / nude · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Rose rather than brown / nude· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Rose rather than brown / nude · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: powder· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than brown / nude· Natural rather than dewy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than brown / nude · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: Rich Mid-Tone Rose Petal Pink Trio
Clinique Chubby Stick Cheek Color Balm Cream Blush in Amp’d Up Apple, against Saie SuperSuede Radiant Talc-Free Baked Powder Blush in Vino. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeVinoClosest shade matchAmp’d Up AppleHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour55%94#a3504a#a25550Very close colourColour difference 1.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 1.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100Brown / nudeBrown / nudeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared56
Finish50%67DewyNaturalSome differenceNatural finish rather than dewy
Pigmentation25%—not comparableNot listedBuildableNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format25%35PowderStickDifferentStick rather than powder
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Overall match 86/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
NARS Talc-Free Powder Blush in Orgasm Rush – 775, against Saie SuperSuede Radiant Talc-Free Baked Powder Blush in Vino. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeVinoClosest overall alternativeOrgasm Rush – 775How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour55%87#a3504a#a74747Very close colourColour difference 2.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 1.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100Brown / nudeBrown / nudeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared87
Finish50%80DewyShimmerCloseShimmer finish rather than dewy
Pigmentation25%—not comparableNot listedBuildableNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format25%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared70
Longevity50%70Long-wearing16-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 16-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Overall match 87/100Shade match 92/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $2 more
