Cream Contour Stick 01 Fair to Light dupes and alternatives Sephora Collection
4.2 (642)·Taupe · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar contour overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar contour on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar contour on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims hydration
Differences: Brown rather than taupe· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than taupe · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than taupe· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than taupe · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: for medium tan – tan complexions
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than taupe· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than taupe · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Brown rather than taupe
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Brown rather than taupe · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Brown rather than taupe
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Brown rather than taupe · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Brown rather than taupe
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Brown rather than taupe · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Bronze rather than taupe
Score details
Shade match
47
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Bronze rather than taupe · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: contour, cool undertone for light to medium skin tones
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Brown rather than taupe
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
96
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Brown rather than taupe · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Brown rather than taupe
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Brown rather than taupe · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Brown rather than taupe
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Brown rather than taupe · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: light with neutral, cool undertones
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than taupe· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than taupe · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: natural matte finish for light to light-medium skin tones
Anastasia Beverly Hills Smooth Blur Cream Contour Stick in Greyscale, against Sephora Collection Cream Contour Stick in 01 Fair to Light. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade01 Fair to LightClosest matchGreyscaleHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall90
Colour50%80#a58a80#a58977Close colourColour difference 3.7 (0 is identical)
Depth25%99LightLightSameDepth difference 0.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100TaupeTaupeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall84
Finish60%78MatteNaturalCloseNatural finish rather than matte
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 3 compared83
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, CombinationNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 87/100Shade match 90/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $14 more
