Bronzer Butter Balm Sculpting Cream Bronzer with Ceramides Haze dupes and alternatives Summer Fridays
4.8 (333)·Bronze · Neutral · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar bronzer overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
58
Slight colour difference · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
58
Slight colour difference · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than neutral undertone· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: medium bronze with warm undertones
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: cream· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than neutral undertone· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry, combination, oily (skin types)
Retailer shade note: tan to tan-deep with a warm red undertone
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Powder rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Very close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than dry, combination, oily (skin types)
Sold as contour, rated here for use as bronzer (suited)
Retailer shade note: deep tan with warm bronzer and cool contour
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Golden rather than bronze· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
36
Very close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Golden rather than bronze · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Combination rather than dry, combination, oily (skin types)
Retailer shade note: Medium to tan with warm golden undertones
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: cream· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than neutral undertone· Golden rather than bronze
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Golden rather than bronze · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry, combination, oily (skin types)
Retailer shade note: medium to tan with a neutral golden undertone
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than dry, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: natural· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry, combination, oily (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry, combination, oily (skin types)
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than dry, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same longevity: 12-hour wear· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than bronze· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than bronze · Powder rather than cream (format) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than dry, combination, oily (skin types)
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Powder rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
73
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than dry, combination, oily (skin types)
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than dry, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same finish: natural· Same format: cream
Differences: Deeper· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
47
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than dry, combination, oily (skin types)
Retailer shade note: deep to rich with neutral undertones
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims comfort
Differences: Golden rather than bronze· Powder rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
58
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than bronze · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: for fair to light complexions
Matches: Same longevity: 12-hour wear· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Rose rather than bronze· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Rose rather than bronze · Powder rather than cream (format) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than dry, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than neutral undertone· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same finish: natural· Same format: cream
Differences: Lighter· Golden rather than bronze· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
47
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Golden rather than bronze · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than dry, combination, oily (skin types)
Retailer shade note: light-medium to tan with neutral undertones
Anastasia Beverly Hills Smooth Blur Powder Bronzer in Sunset Sizzle, against Summer Fridays Bronzer Butter Balm Sculpting Cream Bronzer with Ceramides in Haze. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeHazeClosest shade matchSunset SizzleHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall87
Colour55%89#906d5f#8d675aVery close colourColour difference 2.4 (0 is identical)
Depth25%95Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 2.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%60NeutralWarmSome differenceOne side neutral: partial agreement
Colour family5%100BronzeBronzeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared64
Finish50%78NaturalMatteCloseMatte finish rather than natural
Pigmentation25%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format25%35CreamPowderDifferentPowder rather than cream
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared70
Longevity50%7012-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 12-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%30Dry, Combination, OilyNormal, CombinationDifferentBoth marketed for combination skin
Overall match 76/100Shade match 87/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
NARS The Multiple Sculpting Stick in Taormina, against Summer Fridays Bronzer Butter Balm Sculpting Cream Bronzer with Ceramides in Haze. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeHazeClosest overall alternativeTaorminaHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall86
Colour55%81#906d5f#916653Close colourColour difference 3.5 (0 is identical)
Depth25%95Deep / darkMediumCloseDepth difference 2.8 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 85/100Shade match 86/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta BeautyCosts $4 more
