Perfect Canvas Foundation 11W Tawny dupes and alternatives Temptu
Very deep · Warm undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
77
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel
$13.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$20.01 less (59%)4.3 (33,167)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel
$14.50Ulta Beauty(product price)$19.50 less (57%)4.5 (995)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel
$11.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$22.01 less (65%)4.4 (182,841)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Matte rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
77
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Matte rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Light rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
84
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
77
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
71
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Contains drying alcohol
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Matte rather than natural matte finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Matte rather than natural matte finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Radiant rather than natural matte finish· Light rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
52
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Radiant rather than natural matte finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Described as very deep, yours as tan· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as very deep, yours as tan · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: extra deep with warm undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as very deep, yours as tan
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly deeper· Described as deep, yours as tan· Neutral rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
79
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Described as deep, yours as tan · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage
Retailer shade note: for deep skintones with neutral undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as deep, yours as tan
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Described as deep, yours as tan· Slightly cooler undertone· Light-medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Light-medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as deep, yours as tan · Slightly cooler undertone · Light-medium rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: deep
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as deep, yours as tan
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Described as deep, yours as tan· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
83
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as deep, yours as tan · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: dark deep with warm undertone
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as deep, yours as tan
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Described as deep, yours as tan· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
71
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 30% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as deep, yours as tan · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed
Retailer shade note: deep with warm undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as deep, yours as tan
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Described as deep, yours as tan· Slightly cooler undertone· Matte rather than natural matte finish
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
77
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as deep, yours as tan · Slightly cooler undertone · Matte rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: Deep, cool undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as deep, yours as tan
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Described as deep, yours as tan· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as deep, yours as tan · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: deep auburn, copper undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as deep, yours as tan
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Described as deep, yours as tan· Olive rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as deep, yours as tan · Olive rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: deep skin tones with olive undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as deep, yours as tan
The closest shade to Temptu Perfect Canvas Foundation 11W Tawny (Very deep · Warm undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
Fenty Beauty Pro Filt'r Fluid Flex Natural Matte Longwear Foundation in 486W, against Temptu Perfect Canvas Foundation in 11W Tawny. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade11W TawnyClosest match486WHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%97#73432c#714229Looks identicalColour difference 1.0 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared91
Finish35%78Natural matteNaturalCloseNatural finish rather than natural matte
Coverage30%100BuildableMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than buildable (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall79
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim transfer resistance
Settling20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims not settling into pores or fine lines; your product does not list it
Colour stability15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims colour stability (no oxidation); your product does not list it
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedNormal, combination, oilySkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 91/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $14 more
