Perfect Canvas Foundation 2W Ivory dupes and alternatives Temptu
Light medium · Warm undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
77
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
$8Ulta Beauty(product price)$26 less (76%)4.5 (40,486)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
77
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
$8Ulta Beauty(product price)$26 less (76%)4.5 (40,486)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
77
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Matte rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
77
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Matte rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 27% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: level-two light with a warm undertone
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
71
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
98
Finish & visual result
71
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
77
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: light/medium skin w/ golden undertones
$14.50Ulta Beauty(product price)$19.50 less (57%)4.5 (995)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: fair shade with warm undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
71
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish· Light rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
71
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same buildable coverage
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish· No skin-like finish claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
77
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
77
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: light with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Claims not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
77
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Contains drying alcohol
The closest shade to Temptu Perfect Canvas Foundation 2W Ivory (Light medium · Warm undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
bareMinerals ORIGINAL Loose Talc-Free Mineral Powder Foundation SPF 15 in Golden Medium 14, against Temptu Perfect Canvas Foundation in 2W Ivory. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade2W IvoryClosest shade matchGolden Medium 14How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%98#e0b27e#e2b381Looks identicalColour difference 0.8 (0 is identical)
Finish35%78Natural matteNaturalCloseNatural finish rather than natural matte
Coverage30%100BuildableMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than buildable (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a blurring or smoothing effect; your product does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared51
Longevity30%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Settling20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims not settling into pores or fine lines; your product does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedNormal, dry, combination, sensitiveSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 82/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Fenty Beauty Soft'Lit Naturally Luminous Hydrating Longwear Foundation in 235, against Temptu Perfect Canvas Foundation in 2W Ivory. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade2W IvoryClosest overall alternative235How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%93#e0b27e#ddaf81Very close colourColour difference 1.8 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared77
Finish35%78Natural matteNaturalCloseNatural finish rather than natural matte
Coverage30%100BuildableMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than buildable (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared86
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; the match does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedNormal, dry, combinationSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 87/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraSame price
