Perfect Canvas Foundation 4W Nude dupes and alternatives Temptu
Medium · Warm undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
71
Wear & performance
75
Skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
$12.59$17.99Ulta Beauty$21.41 less (63%)4.2 (8,852)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish· Light rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
99
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
77
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Contains drying alcohol
$12.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$21.01 less (62%)4.4 (41,209)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
77
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
$22Ulta Beauty(product price)$12 less (35%)3.5 (42)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same buildable coverage
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish· No skin-like finish claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
77
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish· Light rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than natural matte finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
77
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than natural matte finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone
Differences: Radiant rather than natural matte finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
52
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural matte finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: light-deep shade, golden undertone
Matches: Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing· Adds SPF 15
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
50
Colour not compared · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
77
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Colour not compared · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Described as medium, yours as light medium· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
79
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as medium, yours as light medium · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage
Retailer shade note: for medium skintones with neutral undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as medium, yours as light medium
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Described as medium, yours as light medium· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as medium, yours as light medium · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: medium with neutral undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as medium, yours as light medium
Matches: Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing· Adds SPF 15
Differences: Slightly lighter· Matte rather than natural matte finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
50
Colour not compared · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Matte rather than natural matte finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel
The closest shade to Temptu Perfect Canvas Foundation 4W Nude (Medium · Warm undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Jane Iredale Skintuition SPF 30 Radiance-Boosting Liquid Foundation in 38 Light Medium, against Temptu Perfect Canvas Foundation in 4W Nude. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade4W NudeClosest shade match38 Light MediumHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall99
Colour60%99#ca976a#cb9768Looks identicalColour difference 0.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100MediumMediumSameDepth difference: 0.1
Retailer descriptionLight mediumLightSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a blurring or smoothing effect; your product does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared74
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims colour stability (no oxidation); your product does not list it
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedCombination, dry, normal, oily, sensitiveSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 85/100Shade match 99/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
m.ph by Mary Phillips Le Skin Weightless Serum Foundation in Light 70 W, against Temptu Perfect Canvas Foundation in 4W Nude. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade4W NudeClosest overall alternativeLight 70 WHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%94#ca976a#c3956bVery close colourColour difference 1.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97MediumMediumSameDepth difference: 1.8
Retailer descriptionLight mediumLightSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared91
Finish35%78Natural matteNaturalCloseNatural finish rather than natural matte
Coverage30%100BuildableMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than buildable (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared72
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Settling20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims not settling into pores or fine lines; your product does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedNormal, dry, combinationSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 89/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.