Perfect Canvas Foundation 6N/W Warm Beige dupes and alternatives Temptu
Tan · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone· Matte rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
71
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone · Matte rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
71
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 30% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed
Retailer shade note: medium deep with warm undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone· Matte rather than natural matte finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone · Matte rather than natural matte finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: medium deep with olive undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
71
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
71
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Radiant rather than natural matte finish· Light rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
98
Finish & visual result
52
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural matte finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: Medium deep with neutral undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same buildable coverage· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Matte rather than natural matte finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
71
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Matte rather than natural matte finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: medium light-deep shade, rosy undertone
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish· Light rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
71
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing· Claims colour stability
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
77
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
71
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Contains drying alcohol
The closest shade to Temptu Perfect Canvas Foundation 6N/W Warm Beige (Tan · Neutral undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
Gucci 24 Hour Full Coverage Luminous Matte Finish Foundation in 380N, against Temptu Perfect Canvas Foundation in 6N/W Warm Beige. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade6N/W Warm BeigeClosest match380NHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%97#b17a53#af7b53Looks identicalColour difference 1.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100TanTanSameDepth difference: 0.0
Retailer descriptionMediumMediumBoth described as mediumThe retailers describe the same depth
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared70
Finish35%78Natural matteMatteCloseMatte finish rather than natural matte
Coverage30%80BuildableFullCloseFull coverage rather than buildable (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared86
Longevity30%70Long-wearing24-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 24-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedNormal, combination, oilySkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 87/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.