S/B Foundation 005 Pure Beige dupes and alternatives Temptu
Medium tan · Cool · pink undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the shade match: colour, depth and undertone only. Each row leads with its shade match; the overall match is beneath it.
Ranked by the shade match: colour, depth and undertone only. Each row leads with its shade match; the overall match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Natural rather than luminous finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
56
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 25% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than luminous finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: medium - deep with cool red undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Matte rather than luminous finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
44
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than luminous finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim long-wearing· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Natural matte rather than luminous finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
42
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 28% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural matte rather than luminous finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed
Retailer shade note: Medium/Tan with Cool Undertones
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Radiant rather than luminous finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
80
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than luminous finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than luminous finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than luminous finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than luminous finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 29% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than luminous finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed
Retailer shade note: medium with neutral undertones
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim a lightweight feel· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Matte rather than luminous finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
44
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than luminous finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim
$16Ulta Beauty(product price)$13 less (45%)4.3 (699)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than luminous finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than luminous finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim long-wearing· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Radiant rather than luminous finish· Light rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than luminous finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: medium light-deep shade, rosy undertone
Matches: Similar undertone (neutral vs cool)· Both claim long-wearing· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than luminous finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
56
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than luminous finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Radiant rather than luminous finish· Light rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Radiant rather than luminous finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: for medium skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Claims not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Radiant rather than luminous finish· Light rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Radiant rather than luminous finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than luminous finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
59
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than luminous finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim
Retailer shade note: Medium with neutral golden undertones
Matches: Both claim long-wearing· Claims colour stability· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than luminous finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
56
Wear & performance
85
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than luminous finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed
Retailer shade note: medium with neutral undertone
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than luminous finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than luminous finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim
Matches: Both claim long-wearing· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Radiant rather than luminous finish· Light rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Radiant rather than luminous finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: very intense dark-medium shade, neutral undertone
The closest shade to Temptu S/B Foundation 005 Pure Beige (Medium tan · Cool · pink undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
PÜR 4-in-1 Love Your Selfie Longwear Foundation & Concealer in DP3 Caramel, against Temptu S/B Foundation in 005 Pure Beige. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade005 Pure BeigeClosest shade matchDP3 CaramelHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall99
Colour60%99#bc826c#bb836dLooks identicalColour difference 0.5 (0 is identical)
Finish35%0LuminousMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than luminous
Coverage30%80BuildableFullCloseFull coverage rather than buildable (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared61
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Settling20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims not settling into pores or fine lines; your product does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; the match does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedCombination, dry, normal, oily, sensitiveSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 79/100Shade match 99/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Haus Labs Triclone Skin Tech Medium Coverage Foundation in 400 Medium Deep, against Temptu S/B Foundation in 005 Pure Beige. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade005 Pure BeigeClosest overall alternative400 Medium DeepHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour60%88#bc826c#c6886fVery close colourColour difference 2.5 (0 is identical)
Finish35%34LuminousNaturalDifferentNatural finish rather than luminous
Coverage30%100BuildableMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than buildable (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 5 compared100
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedNormal, dry, sensitiveSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 84/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)Costs $5 more
