S/B Foundation 007 Golden Honey dupes and alternatives Temptu
Deep tan · Warm · golden undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than luminous finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than luminous finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed
Retailer shade note: medium - neutral, slightly warm olive
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than luminous finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than luminous finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: medium with golden undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Radiant rather than luminous finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
71
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than luminous finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than luminous finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than luminous finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Radiant rather than luminous finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
80
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Radiant rather than luminous finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim
Retailer shade note: medium deep with neutral red undertones
$14Ulta Beauty(product price)$15 less (52%)4.1 (33)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Radiant rather than luminous finish· Light rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
77
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Radiant rather than luminous finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim
$12.59$17.99Ulta Beauty$16.41 less (57%)4.2 (8,852)
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than luminous finish· Light rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
59
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than luminous finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
$20.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$8.01 less (28%)4.3 (8,122)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)
Differences: Radiant rather than luminous finish· Light rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than luminous finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel
$20.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$8.01 less (28%)4.3 (8,122)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)
Differences: Radiant rather than luminous finish· Light rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than luminous finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Natural rather than luminous finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
56
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than luminous finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing· Claims colour stability
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than luminous finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
56
Wear & performance
85
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than luminous finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed
Retailer shade note: medium dark with neutral undertone
The closest shade to Temptu S/B Foundation 007 Golden Honey (Deep tan · Warm · golden undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Temptu Perfect Canvas Foundation in 7W Desert, against Temptu S/B Foundation in 007 Golden Honey. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade007 Golden HoneyClosest shade match7W DesertHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour60%96#a66d42#a86d45Looks identicalColour difference 1.2 (0 is identical)
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared82
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedNot publishedSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 83/100Shade match 97/100Low confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Jane Iredale Skintuition SPF 30 Radiance-Boosting Liquid Foundation in 58 Medium Dark, against Temptu S/B Foundation in 007 Golden Honey. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade007 Golden HoneyClosest overall alternative58 Medium DarkHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour60%89#a66d42#ac7345Very close colourColour difference 2.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%94Deep tanTanCloseDepth difference: 3.2
Retailer descriptionMediumMedium tanSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared85
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims colour stability (no oxidation); your product does not list it
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedCombination, dry, normal, oily, sensitiveSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 89/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta BeautyCosts $27 more
Sephora
