Architecture Soft Matte 24H Multi-Use Foundation Stick 13.5C Sienna dupes and alternatives Tom Ford
4.9 (11)·Medium light · Warm undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect· No fragrance listed
Differences: Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
84
Colour not compared · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect· No fragrance listed
Differences: Slightly lighter· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
84
Colour not compared · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Very close colour· Same matte finish· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Described as medium, yours as deep· Olive rather than warm undertone· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
94
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as medium, yours as deep · Olive rather than warm undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: medium skin with olive undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as medium, yours as deep
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$35 less (58%)4.4 (33)
Matches: Very close colour· Same matte finish· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Described as medium tan, yours as deep· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
94
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as medium tan, yours as deep · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: medium deep with neutral undertone
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as medium tan, yours as deep
The closest shade to Tom Ford Architecture Soft Matte 24H Multi-Use Foundation Stick 13.5C Sienna (Medium light · Warm undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
Wet n Wild PhotoFocus Liquid Foundation in Golden Beige, against Tom Ford Architecture Soft Matte 24H Multi-Use Foundation Stick in 13.5C Sienna. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade13.5C SiennaClosest matchGolden BeigeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%93#ca9f7b#cf9f75Very close colourColour difference 1.8 (0 is identical)
Coverage30%80MediumFullCloseFull coverage rather than medium (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared40
Longevity30%4024-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; the match does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall67
Skin type100%67Normal, dry, combinationDry, normalBoth marketed for normal/dry skin
Overall match 85/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
Target$45.41 less (76%)
