Architecture Soft Matte 24H Multi-Use Foundation Stick 13.5C Sienna dupes and alternatives Tom Ford
4.9 (11)·Medium light · Warm undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Same medium coverage
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim 24-hour wear
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin
$39Ulta Beauty(product price)$21 less (35%)4.3 (6,833)
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Same medium coverage
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same medium coverage
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Same matte finish
Differences: Buildable rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Buildable rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· Light rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Light rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines
$22Ulta Beauty(product price)$38 less (63%)3.5 (42)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· No fragrance listed
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· Buildable rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Very close colour· Same medium coverage· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· Buildable rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
90
Colour not compared · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect· No fragrance listed
Differences: Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
84
Colour not compared · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
$8.74$12.49Ulta Beauty$51.26 less (85%)4.1 (11,038)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Radiant rather than matte finish· Light rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
42
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
90
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than matte finish · Light rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· No fragrance listed· Adds SPF 15
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
38
Skin suitability
84
Looks identical · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel· No fragrance listed
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
90
Colour not compared · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Very close colour· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Luminous rather than matte finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
38
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Luminous · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Luminous rather than matte finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
90
Colour not compared · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect· No fragrance listed
Differences: Slightly lighter· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
84
Colour not compared · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel· No fragrance listed
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
90
Colour not compared · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Same matte finish
Differences: Described as medium tan, yours as deep· Buildable rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
84
Looks identical · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as medium tan, yours as deep · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: dark-medium shade, golden undertone
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as medium tan, yours as deep
Matches: Very close colour· Same matte finish· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Described as medium, yours as deep· Olive rather than warm undertone· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
94
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as medium, yours as deep · Olive rather than warm undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: medium skin with olive undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as medium, yours as deep
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly lighter· Described as light, yours as deep· Slightly cooler undertone
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
84
Colour not compared · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Described as light, yours as deep · Slightly cooler undertone · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed
Retailer shade note: light with cool undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as light, yours as deep
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$35 less (58%)4.4 (33)
Matches: Very close colour· Same matte finish· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Described as medium tan, yours as deep· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
94
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as medium tan, yours as deep · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: medium deep with neutral undertone
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as medium tan, yours as deep
Matches: Very close colour· Same medium coverage· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Described as medium, yours as deep· Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as medium, yours as deep · Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: Medium with neutral cool undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as medium, yours as deep
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same medium coverage· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Described as medium tan, yours as deep· Olive rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as medium tan, yours as deep · Olive rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: Medium Deep with subtle olive undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as medium tan, yours as deep
The closest shade to Tom Ford Architecture Soft Matte 24H Multi-Use Foundation Stick 13.5C Sienna (Medium light · Warm undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
ColourPop Pretty Fresh Hyaluronic Hydrating Foundation in Medium Dark 145W, against Tom Ford Architecture Soft Matte 24H Multi-Use Foundation Stick in 13.5C Sienna. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade13.5C SiennaClosest shade matchMedium Dark 145WHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour60%95#ca9f7b#c99c74Looks identicalColour difference 1.4 (0 is identical)
Overall match 84/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Wet n Wild PhotoFocus Liquid Foundation in Golden Beige, against Tom Ford Architecture Soft Matte 24H Multi-Use Foundation Stick in 13.5C Sienna. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade13.5C SiennaClosest overall alternativeGolden BeigeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%93#ca9f7b#cf9f75Very close colourColour difference 1.8 (0 is identical)
Coverage30%80MediumFullCloseFull coverage rather than medium (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared40
Longevity30%4024-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; the match does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall67
Skin type100%67Normal, dry, combinationDry, normalBoth marketed for normal/dry skin
Overall match 85/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty$48 less (80%)
Sephora
