Architecture Soft Matte 24H Multi-Use Foundation Stick 13.5C Sienna dupes and alternatives Tom Ford
4.9 (11)·Medium light · Warm undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· Buildable rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
90
Colour not compared · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· No fragrance listed· Adds SPF 15
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
38
Skin suitability
84
Looks identical · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel· No fragrance listed
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
90
Colour not compared · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel· No fragrance listed
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
90
Colour not compared · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Very close colour· Same medium coverage· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Described as medium, yours as deep· Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as medium, yours as deep · Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: Medium with neutral cool undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as medium, yours as deep
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same medium coverage· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Described as medium tan, yours as deep· Olive rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as medium tan, yours as deep · Olive rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: Medium Deep with subtle olive undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as medium tan, yours as deep
The closest shade to Tom Ford Architecture Soft Matte 24H Multi-Use Foundation Stick 13.5C Sienna (Medium light · Warm undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Pixi On-the-Glow BASE Foundation Moisture Stick in Nutmeg, against Tom Ford Architecture Soft Matte 24H Multi-Use Foundation Stick in 13.5C Sienna. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade13.5C SiennaClosest shade matchNutmegHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%93#ca9f7b#cb9c72Very close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Overall match 79/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Well People Supernatural Complexion Stick in 18 Light Warm, against Tom Ford Architecture Soft Matte 24H Multi-Use Foundation Stick in 13.5C Sienna. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade13.5C SiennaClosest overall alternative18 Light WarmHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%92#ca9f7b#d2a078Very close colourColour difference 2.0 (0 is identical)
Overall match 79/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
Target$30 less (50%)
Sephora
