Architecture Soft Matte 24H Multi-Use Foundation Stick 18.0N Umber dupes and alternatives Tom Ford
4.9 (11)·Tan · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly lighter· Slightly cooler undertone· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish & visual result
94
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Slightly cooler undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly lighter· Slightly cooler undertone· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Slightly cooler undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: brown skin w/ pink undertones
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect· No fragrance listed
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Same matte finish· No fragrance listed· Adds SPF 15
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
67
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination skin
The closest shade to Tom Ford Architecture Soft Matte 24H Multi-Use Foundation Stick 18.0N Umber (Tan · Neutral undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
Tarte Amazonian Clay 16-Hour Full Coverage Foundation in 56S Rich Sand, against Tom Ford Architecture Soft Matte 24H Multi-Use Foundation Stick in 18.0N Umber. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade18.0N UmberClosest match56S Rich SandHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall81
Colour60%84#a57b68#af7d63Close colourColour difference 3.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96TanTanSameDepth difference: 2.2
Retailer descriptionRich deepNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Coverage30%80MediumFullCloseFull coverage rather than medium (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared82
Longevity30%6024-hour wear16-hour wearSome difference16-hour wear claimed against 24-hour wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall60
Skin type100%60Normal, dry, combinationNormal, combination, oilyBoth marketed for normal/combination skin
Overall match 80/100Shade match 81/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora$18 less (30%)
