Gloss Luxe Lip Gloss with Hydrating Jojoba Oil & High-Shine 23 All Access dupes and alternatives Tom Ford
4.7 (2,341)·Coral · Warm · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lip gloss overall: shade match 50%, finish and visual result 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 10%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lip gloss on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lip gloss on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
fresh Sugar Lip Balm Hydrating Treatment in Coral, against Tom Ford Gloss Luxe Lip Gloss with Hydrating Jojoba Oil & High-Shine in 23 All Access. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade23 All AccessClosest shade matchCoralHow they compareScore
Shade match50% of overall97
Colour55%96#f96c71#fa6771Looks identicalColour difference 1.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98LightLightSameDepth difference 1.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100CoralCoralSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result25% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Shine40%—not comparableShimmerNot listedNot listed for eitherA shine level not listed for one product
Transparency35%—not comparableTintedNot listedNot listed for eitherA transparency not listed for one product
Shimmer25%—not comparableShimmerNot listedNot listed for eitherShimmer not listed for one product
Wear & performance15% of overall100
Longevity100%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Comfort & suitability10% of overall · 1 of 2 compared100
Non-sticky50%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a non-sticky feel
Overall match 86/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Hourglass Phantom Volumizing Glossy Lip Balm in Reveal 90, against Tom Ford Gloss Luxe Lip Gloss with Hydrating Jojoba Oil & High-Shine in 23 All Access. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade23 All AccessClosest overall alternativeReveal 90How they compareScore
Shade match50% of overall74
Colour55%82#f96c71#f6707eClose colourColour difference 3.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightLightSameDepth difference 0.7 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%60WarmNeutralSome differenceOne side neutral: partial agreement
Overall match 87/100Shade match 74/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.