Bouncy Cream Eyeshadow Macaron dupes and alternatives Ulta Beauty Collection
4.1 (289)·Nude · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Peach rather than nude· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than nude · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than nude· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than nude · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than nude· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than nude · Stick rather than powder (format) · 8-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than nude· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than nude · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Plum rather than nude· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
62
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Plum rather than nude · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than nude· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than nude · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Brown rather than nude· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
38
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than nude · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Natasha Denona LUXE GLAM COMPACT Quad Eyeshadow Palette in Cool, against Ulta Beauty Collection Bouncy Cream Eyeshadow in Macaron. Matched on pan 2. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMacaronClosest shade matchCoolHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour60%82#c6a1a4#cca7a3Close colourColour difference 3.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95LightLightSameDepth difference 2.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall93
Finish65%100ShimmerShimmerSameSame shimmer finish
Pigmentation20%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Format15%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Longevity50%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists long wear
Overall match 84/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Ulta Beauty Collection Color Snack Eyeshadow Duo in Berry Bowl, against Ulta Beauty Collection Bouncy Cream Eyeshadow in Macaron. Matched on pan 2. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMacaronClosest overall alternativeBerry BowlHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall87
Colour60%81#c6a1a4#ceaab3Close colourColour difference 3.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%89LightLightSameDepth difference 4.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Overall match 85/100Shade match 87/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.