Too Cheeky Lip & Cheek Color Stick Era dupes and alternatives Ulta Beauty Collection
4.3 (744)·Pink · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same finish: dewy· Claims comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same finish: dewy
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Very close colour · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: dewy· Claims comfort
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Retailer shade note: Rich Mid-Tone Rose Petal Pink Trio
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: dewy· Claims hydration
Differences: Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than dewy (finish)· Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish, pigmentation & format
52
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Rose rather than pink· Natural rather than dewy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Rose rather than pink · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
50
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: dewy· Claims comfort
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Mauve rather than pink· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Mauve rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: dewy· Claims comfort
Differences: Coral rather than pink· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
$11Ulta Beauty(product price)$2 less (15%)4.5 (32,188)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: dewy· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Terracotta rather than pink· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: dewy· Claims comfort
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Matte rather than dewy (finish)· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
39
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
30
Close colour · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
MAC Cosmetics Powder Kiss Liquid Lip & Cheek Mousse in Mull it Over, against Ulta Beauty Collection Too Cheeky Lip & Cheek Color Stick in Era. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeEraClosest shade matchMull it OverHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour55%89#d66461#cc615bVery close colourColour difference 2.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%94MediumMediumSameDepth difference 3.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall50
Finish50%45DewyMatteSome differenceMatte finish rather than dewy
Pigmentation25%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Format25%45StickLiquidSome differenceLiquid rather than stick
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Not listed10-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableCombination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 72/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
MAC Cosmetics Glow Play Cushiony Blush in Groovy, against Ulta Beauty Collection Too Cheeky Lip & Cheek Color Stick in Era. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeEraClosest overall alternativeGroovyHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall87
Colour55%79#d66461#e36c6eClose colourColour difference 3.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%88MediumMediumSameDepth difference 5.2 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 82/100Shade match 87/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.