24/7 Moondust Glittery Eyeshadow Cosmic dupes and alternatives Urban Decay
4.7 (3,002)·White · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Claims crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Silver rather than white· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
53
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Silver rather than white · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Retailer shade note: opalescent white with blue, pink, and purple pearl
Differences: Silver rather than white· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Silver rather than white · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Patrick Ta Major Dimension Eye Illusion Eyeshadow Duo in In Your Dreams, against Urban Decay 24/7 Moondust Glittery Eyeshadow in Cosmic. Matched on the lighter eyeshadow pan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCosmicClosest shade matchIn Your DreamsHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%92#ded0cb#e7d6cfVery close colourColour difference 2.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%94LightLightSameDepth difference 3.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100WhiteWhiteSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall65
Finish65%68GlitterShimmerSome differenceShimmer finish rather than glitter
Pigmentation20%30SheerOpaqueDifferentOpaque rather than sheer
Format15%100PowderPaletteCloseBoth powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%4016-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Overall match 78/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
e.l.f. Cosmetics Fine As Fleck Glitter Eyeshadow in White Hot, against Urban Decay 24/7 Moondust Glittery Eyeshadow in Cosmic. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCosmicClosest overall alternativeWhite HotHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour60%82#ded0cb#e5d1c5Close colourColour difference 3.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98LightLightSameDepth difference 1.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100WhiteWhiteSameSame colour family
Overall match 88/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)$18 less (72%)
