24/7 Moondust Glittery Eyeshadow Space Cowboy dupes and alternatives Urban Decay
4.7 (3,002)·Golden · Warm · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the shade match: colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Each row leads with its shade match; the overall match is beneath it.
Ranked by the shade match: colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Each row leads with its shade match; the overall match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Peach rather than golden· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
62
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than golden · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
62
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: powder· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
53
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 8-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Bronze rather than golden· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than golden · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: glitter· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Taupe rather than golden· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Taupe rather than golden · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Retailer shade note: taupe topper shimmer with silver flecks
Matches: Very close colour· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Mauve rather than golden· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Mauve rather than golden · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Silver rather than golden· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Silver rather than golden · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Taupe rather than golden· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
65
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Taupe rather than golden · Stick rather than powder (format) · 11-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Plum rather than golden· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Duochrome
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Plum rather than golden · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Retailer shade note: burgundy metallic with taupe shimmer/copper rose foil with shifts of pink and gold sparkle
Laura Mercier Caviar Stick Eyeshadow in Mixed Metals, against Urban Decay 24/7 Moondust Glittery Eyeshadow in Space Cowboy. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSpace CowboyClosest shade matchMixed MetalsHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%90#af8e85#a88983Very close colourColour difference 2.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95LightMediumCloseDepth difference 2.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall62
Finish65%68GlitterShimmerSome differenceShimmer finish rather than glitter
Pigmentation20%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Format15%35PowderStickDifferentStick rather than powder
Wear & performance10% of overall50
Longevity50%6016-hour wear24-hour wearSome difference24-hour wear claimed against 16-hour wear
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 77/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
ColourPop Super Shock Shadow in Glow Up, against Urban Decay 24/7 Moondust Glittery Eyeshadow in Space Cowboy. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSpace CowboyClosest overall alternativeGlow UpHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall73
Colour60%65#af8e85#b98a75Slight colour differenceColour difference 5.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightMediumCloseDepth difference 0.5 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 80/100Shade match 73/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $11 more
