Hydromaniac Hydrating Dewy Foundation 90 dupes and alternatives Urban Decay
4.3 (6,764)·Very deep · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$14Ulta Beauty(product price)$21 less (60%)4.1 (33)
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly deeper· Radiant rather than natural finish· Light rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
76
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Radiant rather than natural finish · Light rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim
The closest shade to Urban Decay Hydromaniac Hydrating Dewy Foundation 90 (Very deep · Neutral undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
Refy Skin Base Hydrating Gel Skin Tint in 260N, against Urban Decay Hydromaniac Hydrating Dewy Foundation in 90. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade90Closest match260NHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour60%96#5b3826#5d3b2bLooks identicalColour difference 1.3 (0 is identical)
Coverage30%80MediumLightCloseLight coverage rather than medium (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 5 compared80
Longevity30%7024-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 24-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall40
Skin type100%40Normal, dryNormal, combination, sensitiveBoth marketed for normal skin
Overall match 89/100Shade match 97/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.