Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Terracotta rather than brown· Stick rather than liquid (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than brown · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: liquid· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Claims waterproof
Differences: Stick rather than liquid (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Terracotta rather than brown· Palette rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than brown · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Palette rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Palette rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than brown· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
92
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than brown · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Plum rather than brown· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Plum rather than brown · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 11-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: liquid· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than warm undertone· Mauve rather than brown
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than warm undertone · Mauve rather than brown · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Nude rather than brown
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Nude rather than brown · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Metallic rather than matte (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
23
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Metallic rather than matte (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: a shimmering warm chocolate brown / a rich cool brown
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Metallic rather than matte (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
23
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Metallic rather than matte (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Charlotte Tilbury Exagger-Eyes Waterproof Eyeshadow Stick in Desert Sculpt, against Violette_Fr YEUX PAINT Liquid Eyeshadow & Eyeliner in Caramel Chaud. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCaramel ChaudClosest shade matchDesert SculptHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour60%83#a66247#a66754Close colourColour difference 3.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97MediumMediumSameDepth difference 2.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared69
Finish65%75MatteSatinSome differenceSatin finish rather than matte
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%45LiquidStickSome differenceStick rather than liquid
Wear & performance10% of overall73
Longevity50%70Long-wearing24-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 24-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, Dry, OilyNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 79/100Shade match 89/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
MAC Cosmetics Multisculpt Matte Liquid Eyeshadow + All-Over Color in Hodgepodge, against Violette_Fr YEUX PAINT Liquid Eyeshadow & Eyeliner in Caramel Chaud. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCaramel ChaudClosest overall alternativeHodgepodgeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall82
Colour60%73#a66247#975e3eClose colourColour difference 4.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%90MediumMediumSameDepth difference 4.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Overall match 88/100Shade match 82/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty(product price)$12 less (38%)
