Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
58
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than mauve· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than mauve · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Sold as lipstick, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same format: cream· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Warm rather than cool undertone
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Warm rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than mauve · Does not claim hydration · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: natural· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than mauve· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Visibly different colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than mauve · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Plum rather than mauve· Shimmer rather than natural (finish)· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Plum rather than mauve · Shimmer rather than natural (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Retailer shade note: A burgundy with golden shimmer
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Other rather than mauve· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
69
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Other rather than mauve · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same format: cream· Both claim hydration· Same skin types: normal, dry, combination
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than mauve · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Warm rather than cool undertone
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
73
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Warm rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than mauve · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same format: cream· Both claim hydration· Same skin types: normal, dry, combination
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Terracotta rather than mauve· Dewy rather than natural (finish)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Terracotta rather than mauve · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
CoverGirl Trublend Skin Enhancer Balm Blush Stick in Sleepy Mauve, against Westman Atelier Baby Cheeks Lip + Cheek Cream Blush Stick in Garconne. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeGarconneClosest matchSleepy MauveHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour55%95#a16665#a66664Looks identicalColour difference 1.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100MauveMauveSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared73
Finish50%67NaturalDewySome differenceDewy finish rather than natural
Pigmentation25%—not comparableNot listedBuildableNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format25%85CreamStickCloseStick rather than cream
Wear & performance15% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Longevity50%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists long wear
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Overall match 82/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty$20 less (42%)
