Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same natural finish· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
86
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same natural finish
Differences: Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· Not marketed for sensitive skin
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
57
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same cool undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
98
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
33
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same cool undertone· Both claim 12-hour wear
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
98
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
28
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: light with cool rosy peach undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same cool undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
98
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
28
Looks identical · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: fair skin with a balance of warm & cool undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
28
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
33
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
86
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin
$11.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$27.01 less (69%)4.4 (182,841)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim 12-hour wear· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
30
Looks identical · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Not marketed for normal skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: light with neutral peach undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
28
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: fair skin with a balance of warm & cool undertones
The closest shade to Yepoda The Dewy Day 2C (Very fair · Cool undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
Ogee Multi-Use Sculpted Foundation and Concealer Stick in Cedar 1.20 C, against Yepoda The Dewy Day in 2C. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade2CClosest matchCedar 1.20 CHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall99
Colour60%98#fddac0#fdd9c0Looks identicalColour difference 0.7 (0 is identical)
Coverage30%100BuildableMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than buildable (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a blurring or smoothing effect; your product does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 5 compared80
Longevity30%7012-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 12-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall60
Skin type100%60Normal, dry, sensitiveNormal, dry, combinationBoth marketed for normal/dry skin
Overall match 92/100Shade match 99/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $9 more
