BeyondBlur Skin Perfecting Foundation LC4 dupes and alternatives Youngblood
4.9 (60)·Very fair · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage· Not marketed for combination/oily skin
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
75
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish· Buildable rather than full coverage· Not marketed for normal/sensitive skin
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
83
Wear & performance
35
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · Not marketed for normal/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$33 less (57%)4.2 (812)
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: light with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish· Buildable rather than full coverage· Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
83
Wear & performance
35
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: light skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage· Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Score details
Shade match
98
Finish & visual result
75
Wear & performance
37
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: light to medium with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
$11.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$46.01 less (79%)4.4 (182,841)
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim 12-hour wear
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for dry/combination/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
75
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage· Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
75
Wear & performance
37
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: light to medium with neutral-peach undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly lighter· Slightly cooler undertone· Matte rather than natural matte finish
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
83
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Slightly cooler undertone · Matte rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim 12-hour wear
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Buildable rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for combination/oily skin
Retailer shade note: Light medium shade with cool undertones
The closest shade to Youngblood BeyondBlur Skin Perfecting Foundation LC4 (Very fair · Neutral undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Jung Saem Mool Essential Skin Nuder Long-Lasting Hydrating Compact Cushion Foundation in 19N N-Light, against Youngblood BeyondBlur Skin Perfecting Foundation in LC4. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeLC4Closest shade match19N N-LightHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall99
Colour60%98#f0d2ba#f1d1b8Looks identicalColour difference 0.7 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared64
Finish35%78Natural matteNaturalCloseNatural finish rather than natural matte
Coverage30%60FullMediumSome differenceMedium coverage rather than full
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 5 compared60
Longevity30%7012-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 12-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; your product does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall20
Skin type100%20Dry, normal, combination, oily, sensitiveDryBoth marketed for dry skin
Overall match 80/100Shade match 99/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Revolution Beauty Superfix Blur Longwear Foundation in F1N, against Youngblood BeyondBlur Skin Perfecting Foundation in LC4. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeLC4Closest overall alternativeF1NHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%92#f0d2ba#eacab1Very close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%92Very fairFairCloseDepth difference: 3.8
Retailer descriptionLightFairSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Overall match 87/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.