BeyondBlur Skin Perfecting Foundation TW2 dupes and alternatives Youngblood
4.9 (60)·Medium light · Olive undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the shade match: colour, depth and undertone only. Each row leads with its shade match; the overall match is beneath it.
Ranked by the shade match: colour, depth and undertone only. Each row leads with its shade match; the overall match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same olive undertone· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
59
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
20
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for dry/normal/combination/oily skin
Matches: Very close colour· Claims transfer resistance· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Matte rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Matte rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: Medium to Dark, neutral undertones
Matches: Same olive undertone· Claims transfer resistance· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
$34Ulta Beauty(product price)$24 less (41%)4.5 (9,894)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims not settling into lines· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim 12-hour wear
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
59
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
20
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for dry/normal/combination/oily skin
Matches: Same full coverage· Both claim 12-hour wear· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: medium deep, neutral undertones
Matches: Same full coverage· Both claim 12-hour wear· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: medium deep, neutral undertones
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 16-hour wear· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
83
Wear & performance
67
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: tan with warm peach undertones
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 16-hour wear· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
83
Wear & performance
67
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: medium tan with neutral undertones
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 16-hour wear· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
83
Wear & performance
67
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: tan with warm golden undertones
The closest shade to Youngblood BeyondBlur Skin Perfecting Foundation TW2 (Medium light · Olive undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Ciele tint & PROTECT medium coverage serum foundation in 06 | Medium Tan, against Youngblood BeyondBlur Skin Perfecting Foundation in TW2. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeTW2Closest shade match06 | Medium TanHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%91#cea168#cea567Very close colourColour difference 2.2 (0 is identical)
Overall match 79/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
RMS Beauty ReEvolve Natural Finish Foundation in 55, against Youngblood BeyondBlur Skin Perfecting Foundation in TW2. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeTW2Closest overall alternative55How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour60%89#cea168#d7a165Very close colourColour difference 2.4 (0 is identical)
Overall match 90/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.