Make Me Blush Longwear Natural Glow Cream Blush 23 Hot Mauve dupes and alternatives Yves Saint Laurent
4.8 (772)·Brown / nude · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish)· Powder rather than cream (format)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: soft rose beige (dream blur matte)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Peach rather than brown / nude· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than brown / nude · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Peach rather than brown / nude· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Peach rather than brown / nude · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Peach rather than brown / nude· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than brown / nude · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: Rich Mid-Tone Rose Petal Pink Trio
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Shimmer rather than satin (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Shimmer rather than satin (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: cream· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Peach rather than brown / nude
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Peach rather than brown / nude · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Sold as lipstick, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Peach rather than brown / nude· Matte rather than satin (finish)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Peach rather than brown / nude · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same format: cream
Differences: Coral rather than brown / nude· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than brown / nude · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Rose rather than brown / nude· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Rose rather than brown / nude · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Patrick Ta Major Headlines Double-Take Crème & Powder Blush Duo in Not Too Much, against Yves Saint Laurent Make Me Blush Longwear Natural Glow Cream Blush in 23 Hot Mauve. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade23 Hot MauveClosest matchNot Too MuchHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour55%97#cd8d84#d08b81Looks identicalColour difference 1.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100Brown / nudeBrown / nudeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared93
Finish50%89SatinNaturalCloseNatural finish rather than satin
Pigmentation25%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format25%100CreamCreamSameBoth cream
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 94/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.