Blurring Serum Blush Hibiscus dupes and alternatives Anastasia Beverly Hills
4.6 (904)·Pink · Warm · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: liquid
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims waterproof
Differences: Powder rather than liquid (format)· 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
73
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
73
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims waterproof
Differences: Powder rather than liquid (format)· 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
73
Close colour · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Shimmer rather than natural (finish)· Powder rather than liquid (format)· 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish, pigmentation & format
54
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than natural (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
32
Close colour · Satin · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim hydration · Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims comfort
Differences: Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Powder rather than liquid (format)· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: liquid· Claims comfort
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Benefit Cosmetics Juice Stick Dewy Gel-Cream Blush in Shellie, against Anastasia Beverly Hills Blurring Serum Blush in Hibiscus. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeHibiscusClosest shade matchShellieHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour55%92#fe9c99#fea49eVery close colourColour difference 2.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96LightLightSameDepth difference 2.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall65
Finish50%67NaturalDewySome differenceDewy finish rather than natural
Pigmentation25%65BuildableSheerSome differenceSheer rather than buildable
Format25%60LiquidCreamSome differenceCream rather than liquid
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Not listedLong-wearingSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall44
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Skin types40%20Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNormalDifferentBoth marketed for normal skin
Overall match 77/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Milk Makeup Cooling Water Jelly Tint Lip + Cheek Blush Stain in Phreeze, against Anastasia Beverly Hills Blurring Serum Blush in Hibiscus. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeHibiscusClosest overall alternativePhreezeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour55%84#fe9c99#fea195Close colourColour difference 3.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98LightLightSameDepth difference 1.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Finish50%—not comparableNaturalNot listedNot listed for eitherA finish not listed for one product
Skin types40%—not comparableCombination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 86/100Shade match 91/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta BeautyCosts $9 more
