Impeccable Blurring Second-Skin Matte Foundation 1.5CR dupes and alternatives Anastasia Beverly Hills
4.4 (4,961)·Light · Cool · rosy undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same matte finish
Differences: Slightly lighter· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Buildable rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
90
Colour not compared · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
56
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: fair cool skin with pink undertones
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same matte finish· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly lighter· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
49
Skin suitability
67
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for normal skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: light skin with pink undertones
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
90
Colour not compared · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: Light Complexion with a balance of warm and cool undertones
The closest shade to Anastasia Beverly Hills Impeccable Blurring Second-Skin Matte Foundation 1.5CR (Light · Cool · rosy undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
L'Oréal Paris Lumi Le Glow Skin Tint in Light Cool, against Anastasia Beverly Hills Impeccable Blurring Second-Skin Matte Foundation in 1.5CR. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade1.5CRClosest shade matchLight CoolHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour60%88#ddc0b5#ddbfaeVery close colourColour difference 2.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightLightSameDepth difference: 0.6
Retailer descriptionLightNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Overall match 76/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Lancôme Dual Finish Multi-Tasking Lightweight Pressed Powder Foundation in 100 Versatile Porcelaine Delicate I (C), against Anastasia Beverly Hills Impeccable Blurring Second-Skin Matte Foundation in 1.5CR. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade1.5CRClosest overall alternative100 Versatile Porcelaine Delicate I (C)How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall79
Colour60%84#ddc0b5#eacbbcClose colourColour difference 3.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%86LightFairCloseDepth difference: 5.8
Retailer descriptionLightNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Overall match 81/100Shade match 79/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Walmart
Ulta Beauty$33 less (67%)
Target
