Impeccable Blurring Second-Skin Matte Foundation 1.5CR dupes and alternatives Anastasia Beverly Hills
4.4 (4,961)·Light · Cool · rosy undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same matte finish
Differences: Slightly lighter· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Buildable rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
90
Colour not compared · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
56
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: fair cool skin with pink undertones
Matches: Similar undertone (neutral vs cool)· Same matte finish· Same full coverage
Differences: Slightly lighter· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: fair or light skin tones with a neutral cool undertone
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines
$6.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$42.01 less (86%)3.8 (142)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same matte finish· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: light with cool rosy undertones
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same matte finish· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly lighter· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
49
Skin suitability
67
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for normal skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: light skin with pink undertones
$6.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$42.01 less (86%)3.8 (142)
Matches: Similar undertone (neutral vs cool)· Same matte finish· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Slightly lighter· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: light with cool neutral undertones
$38Ulta Beauty(product price)$11 less (22%)4.8 (950)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Light-medium rather than full coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Light-medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Light-medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly lighter· Light rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Slightly lighter · Light rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
90
Colour not compared · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: Light Complexion with a balance of warm and cool undertones
The closest shade to Anastasia Beverly Hills Impeccable Blurring Second-Skin Matte Foundation 1.5CR (Light · Cool · rosy undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Estée Lauder Futurist Hydra Rescue Moisturizing Foundation SPF 45 in 1C1 Cool Bone, against Anastasia Beverly Hills Impeccable Blurring Second-Skin Matte Foundation in 1.5CR. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade1.5CRClosest shade match1C1 Cool BoneHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%93#ddc0b5#d9bdafVery close colourColour difference 1.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97LightLightSameDepth difference: 1.8
Retailer descriptionLightLightBoth described as lightThe retailers describe the same depth
Finish35%12MatteRadiantDifferentRadiant finish rather than matte
Coverage30%80FullMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than full (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared40
Longevity30%4012-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; the match does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall60
Skin type100%60Normal, combination, oilyNormal, dry, oilyBoth marketed for normal/oily skin
Overall match 72/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Tarte Amazonian Clay 16-Hour Full Coverage Foundation in 20B Light Beige, against Anastasia Beverly Hills Impeccable Blurring Second-Skin Matte Foundation in 1.5CR. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade1.5CRClosest overall alternative20B Light BeigeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall86
Colour60%78#ddc0b5#dfb9a6Close colourColour difference 3.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96LightLightSameDepth difference: 2.7
Retailer descriptionLightLightBoth described as lightThe retailers describe the same depth
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared91
Longevity30%8012-hour wear16-hour wearClose16-hour wear claimed against 12-hour wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall100
Skin type100%100Normal, combination, oilyNormal, combination, oilyBoth marketed for normal/combination/oily skin
Overall match 88/100Shade match 86/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
Sephora$1 less (2%)
Target
Walmart
