Impeccable Blurring Second-Skin Matte Foundation 10N dupes and alternatives Anastasia Beverly Hills
4.4 (4,961)·Rich deep · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Natural matte rather than matte finish· Buildable rather than full coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
77
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural matte rather than matte finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: deep shade with neutral-to-cool undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same full coverage· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Natural rather than matte finish· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Natural rather than matte finish · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for normal skin
Retailer shade note: ultra deep with deep-neutral undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same matte finish· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Medium rather than full coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
94
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
33
Slight colour difference · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Medium rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for normal/oily skin
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Buildable rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: Ultra Rich skin with neutral-warm undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly cooler undertone· Radiant rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish & visual result
63
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly cooler undertone · Radiant rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Not marketed for normal skin
Retailer shade note: espresso - rich brown skin with pink undertones
$42Ulta Beauty(product price)$7 less (14%)4.4 (38)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 12-hour wear
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Natural rather than matte finish· Buildable rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
84
Visibly different colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Natural rather than matte finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: very deep with neutral undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
60
Visibly different colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: deep rich with neutral undertones
$6.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$42.01 less (86%)3.8 (142)
Matches: Same matte finish· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: very deep with cool undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for oily skin
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$24 less (49%)4.2 (812)
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
90
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: rich deepest with cool blue undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Radiant rather than matte finish· Light rather than full coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
36
Wear & performance
52
Skin suitability
30
Close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than matte finish · Light rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/oily skin
Retailer shade note: rich deep with neutral red undertones
The closest shade to Anastasia Beverly Hills Impeccable Blurring Second-Skin Matte Foundation 10N (Rich deep · Neutral undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Huda Beauty Easy Blur Natural Airbrush Foundation in Espresso 600N, against Anastasia Beverly Hills Impeccable Blurring Second-Skin Matte Foundation in 10N. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade10NClosest shade matchEspresso 600NHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour60%88#28181b#301c1dVery close colourColour difference 2.6 (0 is identical)
Finish35%56MatteNaturalSome differenceNatural finish rather than matte
Coverage30%80FullBuildableCloseBuildable coverage rather than full (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared68
Longevity30%7012-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 12-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall60
Skin type100%60Normal, combination, oilyNormal, dry, oilyBoth marketed for normal/oily skin
Overall match 81/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Tarte Face Tape Full Coverage Foundation in 64W espresso warm, against Anastasia Beverly Hills Impeccable Blurring Second-Skin Matte Foundation in 10N. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade10NClosest overall alternative64W espresso warmHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall81
Colour60%82#28181b#301c1bClose colourColour difference 3.3 (0 is identical)
Transfer resistance20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall100
Skin type100%100Normal, combination, oilyNormal, combination, oilyBoth marketed for normal/combination/oily skin
Overall match 84/100Shade match 81/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.