Impeccable Blurring Second-Skin Matte Foundation 10N dupes and alternatives Anastasia Beverly Hills
4.4 (4,961)·Rich deep · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same full coverage· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Natural rather than matte finish· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Natural rather than matte finish · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for normal skin
Retailer shade note: ultra deep with deep-neutral undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: very deep with neutral undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
60
Visibly different colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: deep rich with neutral undertones
The closest shade to Anastasia Beverly Hills Impeccable Blurring Second-Skin Matte Foundation 10N (Rich deep · Neutral undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
Tarte Face Tape Full Coverage Foundation in 64W espresso warm, against Anastasia Beverly Hills Impeccable Blurring Second-Skin Matte Foundation in 10N. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade10NClosest match64W espresso warmHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall81
Colour60%82#28181b#301c1bClose colourColour difference 3.3 (0 is identical)
Transfer resistance20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall100
Skin type100%100Normal, combination, oilyNormal, combination, oilyBoth marketed for normal/combination/oily skin
Overall match 84/100Shade match 81/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora$9 less (18%)
