Impeccable Blurring Second-Skin Matte Foundation 6WO dupes and alternatives Anastasia Beverly Hills
4.4 (4,961)·Deep · Olive · warm olive undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same matte finish· Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Same matte finish· Same full coverage· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
49
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: medium deep with neutral undertones
Matches: Same matte finish· Same full coverage· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· No blurring effect claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
33
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for normal/oily skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: Deep tan with red-golden undertones
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than olive undertone· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
94
Wear & performance
59
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than olive undertone · Medium rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
90
Close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Very close colour· Same matte finish· Same full coverage
Differences: No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
30
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/oily skin
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural matte rather than matte finish· Buildable rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
77
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural matte rather than matte finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: tan shade with neutral undertones
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 16-hour wear· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for oily skin
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: medium deep with neutral undertones
Matches: Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
67
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for normal skin
Retailer shade note: for tan-deep skin with neutral copper undertones
$24Ulta Beauty(product price)$25 less (51%)4.3 (49)
Matches: Same full coverage· Both claim a lightweight feel· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 25% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: medium-deep with neutral peach undertones
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Same full coverage· Both claim 16-hour wear· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: deeper tan skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Light rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
49
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Light rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Radiant rather than matte finish· Light rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
51
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Radiant rather than matte finish · Light rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines
$24Ulta Beauty(product price)$25 less (51%)4.3 (49)
Matches: Same full coverage· Both claim a lightweight feel· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 25% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: medium-deep with neutral undertones
$6.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$42.01 less (86%)3.8 (142)
Matches: Same matte finish· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: tan deep with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Light rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
49
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Light rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: medium dark with neutral undertones
Matches: Same matte finish· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination skin
Matches: Both claim a lightweight feel· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim a lightweight feel· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Light rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Light rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for normal skin
Matches: Same matte finish· Same full coverage· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
30
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/oily skin
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Radiant rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
51
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Radiant rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: for deeper skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Both claim a lightweight feel· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
52
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
0
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for normal/combination/oily skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Both claim a lightweight feel· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
52
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
0
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for normal/combination/oily skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Very close colour· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Radiant rather than matte finish· Light rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
30
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Radiant rather than matte finish · Light rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
The closest shade to Anastasia Beverly Hills Impeccable Blurring Second-Skin Matte Foundation 6WO (Deep · Olive · warm olive undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
BLK/OPL TRUE COLOR Skin Perfecting Stick Foundation SPF 15 in Au Chocolat, against Anastasia Beverly Hills Impeccable Blurring Second-Skin Matte Foundation in 6WO. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade6WOClosest matchAu ChocolatHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall85
Colour60%90#825c48#845c42Very close colourColour difference 2.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100DeepDeepSameDepth difference: 0.2
Retailer descriptionTanMedium tanSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Overall match 81/100Shade match 85/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.