Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims comfort
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Peach rather than brown / nude· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Peach rather than brown / nude · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same format: cream· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Rose rather than brown / nude· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Rose rather than brown / nude · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims comfort
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Satin rather than matte (finish)· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Satin rather than matte (finish) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same format: cream· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Rose rather than brown / nude· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Rose rather than brown / nude · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Rose rather than brown / nude· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Rose rather than brown / nude · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: Rich Mid-Tone Rose Petal Pink Trio
Matches: Very close colour· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims comfort
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Mauve rather than brown / nude· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Mauve rather than brown / nude · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Peach rather than brown / nude· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Peach rather than brown / nude · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims waterproof
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Powder rather than cream (format)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
73
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Powder rather than cream (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims waterproof
Differences: Lighter· Warm rather than neutral undertone· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
58
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Rose rather than brown / nude· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
69
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Rose rather than brown / nude · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Mauve rather than brown / nude· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
69
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Mauve rather than brown / nude · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Rose rather than brown / nude· Powder rather than cream (format)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than brown / nude · Powder rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims comfort
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Rose rather than brown / nude· Dewy rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Rose rather than brown / nude · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Does not claim hydration
MAC Cosmetics Skinfinish Colorstruck Blush in Thanks, Its MAC!, against Armani Beauty Dolci Blush Smoothing Cream-to-Powder Soft-Matte Balm in 4, Cinnamon Blush. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade4, Cinnamon BlushClosest shade matchThanks, Its MAC!How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall87
Colour55%89#bf6e68#ba6764Very close colourColour difference 2.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%94MediumMediumSameDepth difference 3.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%60NeutralWarmSome differenceOne side neutral: partial agreement
Colour family15%100Brown / nudeBrown / nudeSameSame colour family
Overall match 81/100Shade match 87/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Patrick Ta Major Headlines Double-Take Crème & Powder Blush Duo in She's Blushing, against Armani Beauty Dolci Blush Smoothing Cream-to-Powder Soft-Matte Balm in 4, Cinnamon Blush. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade4, Cinnamon BlushClosest overall alternativeShe's BlushingHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall81
Colour55%89#bf6e68#c1766eVery close colourColour difference 2.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95MediumMediumSameDepth difference 3.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%60NeutralWarmSome differenceOne side neutral: partial agreement
Overall match 84/100Shade match 81/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $3 more
