Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same format: cream· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Pink rather than mauve· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Looks identical · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Pink rather than mauve · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
$36Ulta Beauty(product price)$3 less (8%)4.3 (1,914)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims comfort
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Powder rather than cream (format)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Powder rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Same format: cream
Differences: Rose rather than mauve· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
73
Very close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than mauve · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Pink rather than mauve· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Pink rather than mauve · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims comfort
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Rose rather than mauve· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Rose rather than mauve · Powder rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Powder rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
69
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: cream· Claims waterproof
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims comfort
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Pink rather than mauve· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
58
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Pink rather than mauve · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims comfort
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
58
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Pink rather than mauve· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Pink rather than mauve · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Pink rather than mauve· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Pink rather than mauve · Powder rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Same format: cream
Differences: Rose rather than mauve· Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than mauve · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Pink rather than mauve· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
69
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Pink rather than mauve · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Deeper· Cool rather than neutral undertone· Pink rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Cool rather than neutral undertone · Pink rather than mauve · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Deeper· Cool rather than neutral undertone· Pink rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Cool rather than neutral undertone · Pink rather than mauve · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Clinique Cheek Pop Powder Blush in Heather Pop, against Armani Beauty Dolci Blush Smoothing Cream-to-Powder Soft-Matte Balm in 5, Mauve Blush. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade5, Mauve BlushClosest matchHeather PopHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour55%96#dd9397#dd979aLooks identicalColour difference 1.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98LightLightSameDepth difference 1.4 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 88/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.