GEN NUDE Liquid Mineral Eyeshadow Sandstone dupes and alternatives bareMinerals
4.7 (141)·Nude · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Golden rather than nude· Liquid rather than stick (format)· 16-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than nude · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: champagne with silver and copper pearls
$7Ulta Beauty(product price)$18 less (72%)4.5 (2,019)
Glitter
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: warm beige with multi-colored glitter
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Golden rather than nude· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than nude · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: White rather than nude· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than nude · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Clinique All About Shadow Quad Eyeshadow in Morning Java, against bareMinerals GEN NUDE Liquid Mineral Eyeshadow in Sandstone. Matched on pan 1. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSandstoneClosest matchMorning JavaHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%97#efd4c9#f1d4caLooks identicalColour difference 1.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100LightLightSameDepth difference 0.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared76
Finish65%85MetallicShimmerCloseShimmer finish rather than metallic
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists an opacity
Format15%35StickPowderDifferentPowder rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall73
Longevity50%708-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 8-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedSensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 86/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.