ORIGINAL Talc-Free Pressed Powder Foundation Mineral SPF 15 Tan 19 dupes and alternatives bareMinerals
4.6 (919)·Medium · Cool · rosy undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims 12-hour wear
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry/oily skin · No SPF
Matches: Same matte finish· Claims 36-hour wear· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
89
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for normal/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: medium tan with neutral undertones
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Medium rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: medium to tan skin with a balance of warm & cool undertones
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same matte finish· Claims 36-hour wear
Differences: Slightly lighter· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
89
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for normal/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: medium tan with cool rosy-beige undertones
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Slightly deeper· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims 24-hour wear
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · No SPF
$6.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$32.51 less (82%)3.8 (142)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same matte finish
Differences: Slightly lighter· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
89
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · No SPF
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/normal/oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: medium with neutral undertones
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims 12-hour wear· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than matte finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than matte finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Radiant rather than matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
57
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Matches: Same matte finish· Claims 24-hour wear· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Full rather than buildable coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Full rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims 18-hour wear
Differences: Slightly lighter· Radiant rather than matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
59
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Radiant rather than matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Claims long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
$14.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$24.51 less (62%)4.3 (32,897)
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims 24-hour wear
Differences: Slightly lighter· Full rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
93
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Full rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/dry/sensitive skin · No SPF
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Light rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · No SPF
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than matte finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for normal/sensitive skin
Matches: Similar undertone (neutral vs cool)· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for normal/sensitive skin · No SPF
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
80
Colour not compared · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · No SPF
Matches: Claims 12-hour wear· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Claims 12-hour wear· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry/oily skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: Medium-deep with neutral undertones
Differences: Radiant rather than matte finish· Light rather than buildable coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
43
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than matte finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Retailer shade note: intense medium shade, rosy undertone
The closest shade to bareMinerals ORIGINAL Talc-Free Pressed Powder Foundation Mineral SPF 15 Tan 19 (Medium · Cool · rosy undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
L'Oréal Paris True Match Super-Blendable Foundation in C5 Cool Medium, against bareMinerals ORIGINAL Talc-Free Pressed Powder Foundation Mineral SPF 15 in Tan 19. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeTan 19Closest shade matchC5 Cool MediumHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall90
Colour60%84#ce9482#d1977dClose colourColour difference 3.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumMediumSameDepth difference: 1.3
Retailer descriptionMedium tanNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Overall match 77/100Shade match 90/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Ulta Beauty Collection Velvet Veil Minerals Powder Foundation in Tan Neutral, against bareMinerals ORIGINAL Talc-Free Pressed Powder Foundation Mineral SPF 15 in Tan 19. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeTan 19Closest overall alternativeTan NeutralHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall86
Colour60%91#ce9482#cc947dVery close colourColour difference 2.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference: 0.5
Retailer descriptionMedium tanNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Overall match 84/100Shade match 86/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.