Hoola Matte Powder Bronzer Medium Deep dupes and alternatives Benefit Cosmetics
4.5 (7,788)·Bronze · Cool · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar bronzer overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same format: powder· Both claim transfer resistance· Claims hydration
Differences: Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof· Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, combination, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, combination, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Golden rather than bronze· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than bronze · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same finish: matte· Same format: powder
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Golden rather than bronze· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
62
Looks identical · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Golden rather than bronze · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: rich caramel with warm undertone
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same finish: matte· Same format: powder
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
62
Looks identical · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Brown rather than bronze· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 28% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than bronze · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: powder· Same longevity: 12-hour wear
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Golden rather than bronze· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
35
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Golden rather than bronze · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, combination, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Brown rather than bronze· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 28% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than bronze · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Golden rather than bronze· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than bronze · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, combination, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Same format: powder
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than bronze· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
35
Very close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than bronze · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, combination, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
38
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, combination, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: very tan deep with neutral bronze undertones
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: powder· Claims hydration
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, combination, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Stick rather than powder (format)· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
60
Comfort & skin suitability
32
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Stick rather than powder (format) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, combination, sensitive (skin types)
Sold as contour, rated here for use as bronzer (suited)
Retailer shade note: light-medium with neutral undertones
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Cream rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
35
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than normal, combination, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Golden rather than bronze· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
62
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than bronze · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: for light to medium complexions
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Same format: powder
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
62
Very close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: powder· Same longevity: 12-hour wear
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than bronze· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
35
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than bronze · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, combination, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
56
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Dry, Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, combination, sensitive (skin types)
Sold as contour, rated here for use as bronzer (suited)
Retailer shade note: natural matte finish for medium to medium-dark skin tones
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
62
Close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: powder· Claims comfort
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
62
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: powder· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Golden rather than bronze· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Golden rather than bronze · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: medium-deep to deep with golden neutral undertone
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim transfer resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
62
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Sold as contour, rated here for use as bronzer (suited)
Retailer shade note: light to medium with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Claims comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Very close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, combination, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Very close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, combination, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: natural skin-like finish for dark skin tones
Dior Forever Skin Contour Stick in 02 Tan, against Benefit Cosmetics Hoola Matte Powder Bronzer in Medium Deep. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMedium DeepClosest shade match02 TanHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour55%88#a9694d#b36b4aVery close colourColour difference 2.6 (0 is identical)
Depth25%96MediumLightCloseDepth difference 2.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableCoolNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family20%100BronzeBronzeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall64
Finish50%78MatteNaturalCloseNatural finish rather than matte
Pigmentation25%65BuildableSheerSome differenceSheer rather than buildable
Format25%35PowderStickDifferentStick rather than powder
Wear & performance15% of overall50
Longevity50%3512-hour wear24-hour wearDifferent24-hour wear claimed against 12-hour wear
Transfer resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Combination, SensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 76/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Fenty Beauty Sun Stalk'r Instant Warmth Bronzer in Coco Naughty, against Benefit Cosmetics Hoola Matte Powder Bronzer in Medium Deep. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMedium DeepClosest overall alternativeCoco NaughtyHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour55%95#a9694d#a86747Very close colourColour difference 1.5 (0 is identical)
Depth25%98MediumDeep / darkCloseDepth difference 1.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%60CoolNeutralSome differenceOne side neutral: partial agreement
Colour family5%100BronzeBronzeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Finish50%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation25%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format25%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance15% of overall73
Longevity50%7012-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 12-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance30%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim transfer resistance
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared84
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Overall match 90/100Shade match 91/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta BeautyCosts $28 more
