Hoola Matte Powder Bronzer Medium dupes and alternatives Benefit Cosmetics
4.5 (7,788)·Golden · Cool · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar bronzer overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Same format: powder
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Bronze rather than golden· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Very close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Bronze rather than golden · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, combination, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: powder· Claims hydration
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Bronze rather than golden· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Bronze rather than golden · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, combination, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Deeper· Bronze rather than golden· 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
20
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Bronze rather than golden · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Oily rather than normal, combination, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: powder· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Deeper· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Bronze rather than golden
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Bronze rather than golden · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim transfer resistance· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, combination, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim waterproof· Claims comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
62
Very close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: rich caramel with neutral undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same finish: matte· Claims comfort
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: light to medium with neutral, slightly golden undertones
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: powder· Same longevity: 12-hour wear
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Does not claim transfer resistance· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
35
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, combination, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Claims comfort
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: medium to tan with warm, slightly neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims comfort
Differences: Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Liquid rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish, pigmentation & format
53
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
58
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
56
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily rather than normal, combination, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: powder· Claims comfort
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Bronze rather than golden· Satin rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
62
Very close colour · Satin · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 27% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Bronze rather than golden · Satin rather than matte (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: medium-deep bronze with warm undertones
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: powder· Claims comfort
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Bronze rather than golden· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
62
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Bronze rather than golden · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Lighter· Warm rather than cool undertone· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
56
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Warm rather than cool undertone · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily rather than normal, combination, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: powder· Same longevity: 12-hour wear
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than golden· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
35
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than golden · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, combination, sensitive (skin types)
Makeup By Mario Softsculpt Multi-Use Bronzing & Shaping Serum with Hyaluronic Acid in Medium Dark, against Benefit Cosmetics Hoola Matte Powder Bronzer in Medium. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMediumClosest shade matchMedium DarkHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour55%96#b67650#b57956Looks identicalColour difference 1.3 (0 is identical)
Depth25%98MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableCoolNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family20%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall60
Finish50%78MatteNaturalCloseNatural finish rather than matte
Pigmentation25%65BuildableSheerSome differenceSheer rather than buildable
Format25%20PowderLiquidDifferentLiquid rather than powder
Wear & performance15% of overall40
Longevity50%4012-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall48
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Overall match 77/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Givenchy Prisme Libre 4-Color Blurring & Sculpting Bronzer Powder in 003-Organza Bronzé, against Benefit Cosmetics Hoola Matte Powder Bronzer in Medium. Matched on pan 1. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMediumClosest overall alternative003-Organza BronzéHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour55%94#b67650#b07651Very close colourColour difference 1.5 (0 is identical)
Depth25%98MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableCoolNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family20%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Overall match 89/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $26 more
Ulta Beauty
